Born to do Math 37 – Metaprimes (Part 3)

In-Sight Publishing
Born to do Math 37 - Metaprimes (Part 3)

Scott Douglas Jacobsen & Rick Rosner

April 13, 2017

[Beginning of recorded material]

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: As you know, math assumes axioms. So this is assuming some axioms. So one that comes to mind—well, even before that, when you’re talking about – as a premise to this appendix to the previous discussion. It was codeless information in the universe with an example to metaprimes and the axioms that are being assumed here are a) the prime sequences and b) [Laughing] the metaprime sequences implied within that.

So it is not necessarily codeless. Is it? Or if it isn’t, how?

Rick Rosner: I’m not saying that it is. I am saying it is a way of defining words by their relationships to each other, via the integers and their relationships to one another. I would think it has implications in terms of things like the Twin Prime Theorem, which is that – or postulates. It is not a theorem. It postulates that there are a limited number of primes that differ only by 2, like 3 and 5, 5 and 7, 11 and 13, 29 and 31.

SDJ: Is it the Twin Prime Conjecture? It is just coming to me now.

RR: Theorem, Conjecture, sorry. There’s no biggest pair of twin primes. You can always find a biggest pair, which is the same as saying there’s an infinity of them. You can’t – to be clear—there’s only one set of primes that differ by 1, which is 2 and 3. There are no more primes that differ by 1. That would require one of those numbers to be even and each of those numbers is divisible by 2.

But you can have a bunch of numbers. People conjecture that there is an infinity of them that differ by 2: 100 and 103, you can’t have 3 in the row except for 3, 5, and 7.

[End of recorded material]

Authors[1]

Rick Rosner
American Television Writer
RickRosner@Hotmail.Com
Rick Rosner

Scott Douglas Jacobsen
Editor-in-Chief, In-Sight Publishing
Scott.D.Jacobsen@Gmail.Com
In-Sight Publishing

Endnotes

[1] Four format points for the session article:

1. Bold text following “Scott Douglas Jacobsen:” or “Jacobsen:” is Scott Douglas Jacobsen & non-bold text following “Rick Rosner:” or “Rosner:” is Rick Rosner.
2. Session article conducted, transcribed, edited, formatted, and published by Scott.
3. Footnotes & in-text citations in the interview & references after the interview.
4. This session article has been edited for clarity and readability.

For further information on the formatting guidelines incorporated into this document, please see the following documents:

1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Citation Guide: APA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.sfu.ca/system/files/28281/APA6CitationGuideSFUv3.pdf.
2. Humble, A. (n.d.). Guide to Transcribing. Retrieved from http://www.msvu.ca/site/media/msvu/Transcription%20Guide.pdf.

License and Copyright
License
In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at www.in-sightjournal.com and www.rickrosner.org.
Copyright
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 2012-2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.