Born to do Math 15 - 5 Brothers-4 Sisters & 4 Sisters-5 Brothers
Scott Douglas Jacobsen & Rick Rosner
March 22, 2017
[Beginning
of recorded material]
One
more thing I was thinking about with regard to information in the universe.
Inside of a computer, things have definite values and things represent
specific. When you think about things going on in a computer, you think about
every flip from a 1 to a 0 equals a definite change in some linear and very
regimented process, which results in rigid calculations in the computer. But
when you look at how we perceive the world, let’s try to perceive an orange as
an example.
Light
bounces off the orange and hits your eye, and you get enough photons off the
orange and you’re able to perceive it as an orange, but it doesn’t particularly
matter which orange in the orange’s skin.
[End
of recorded material]
[Beginning of recorded material]
Rick
Rosner: Photons carry the energy from
electromagnetic interactions, and I think, it just takes small, not imbalances,
but asymmetries. Asymmetries does not seem like the right word either—it just
takes a small shift, a one part in 10^40th, in the characteristics
of electromagnetic interactions. That would be enough to account for
gravitation. That could be something as simple as taking self-repulsion or
self-attraction of electromagnetic interactions.
But I
don’t know—whatever it’s called, I’m talking out of my butt. So imagine a
universe where you have 5 of each. So that should be a next attractive universe
in my lame way of trying to understand stuff because each proton, because opposites
attract, is attracted by 5 of the other thing, but only repelled by 4 of its
own thing. It is like being in a family with 5 brothers and 4 sisters.
Each
member of the family always has more of the other sexed sibling regardless of
which sex you’re talking about. Each boy has 4 brothers and 5 sisters. Each
girl has 4 sisters and 5 brothers. If you’re able to pull out some
self-repulsion out of the next attraction versus repulsion, that might be
enough to account for gravity, or some other trick that leaves gravitation in
the hands of the electromagnetic interaction.
Authors[1]
Rick Rosner
American Television Writer
RickRosner@Hotmail.Com
Rick Rosner
Scott Douglas Jacobsen
Editor-in-Chief, In-Sight Publishing
Scott.D.Jacobsen@Gmail.Com
In-Sight Publishing
Endnotes
[1] Four format points for the session article:- Bold text following “Scott Douglas Jacobsen:” or “Jacobsen:” is Scott Douglas Jacobsen & non-bold text following “Rick Rosner:” or “Rosner:” is Rick Rosner.
- Session article conducted, transcribed, edited, formatted, and published by Scott.
- Footnotes & in-text citations in the interview & references after the interview.
- This session article has been edited for clarity and readability.
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Citation Guide: APA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.sfu.ca/system/files/28281/APA6CitationGuideSFUv3.pdf.
- Humble, A. (n.d.). Guide to Transcribing. Retrieved from http://www.msvu.ca/site/media/msvu/Transcription%20Guide.pdf.
License
In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at www.in-sightjournal.com and www.rickrosner.org.
Copyright
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 2012-2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, Rick Rosner, and In-Sight Publishing and In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
No comments:
Post a Comment